Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø

ͼƬ

Rhodes Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø lights up in talk on intersex politics

The Trial of Caster Semenya panel
The Trial of Caster Semenya panel

By Boitumelo Nte, Journalism & Media Studies student

 

In its closing event for the year, Rhodes Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø¡¯s Office of Equity and Institutional Culture, together with Department of Political and International Relations, held ¡®The Trial of Caster Semenya¡¯ seminar at Eden Grove.

The Semenya seminar was contextualised on the backdrop of elite athlete Caster Semenya¡¯s battle with the International Association of Athletics Federations¡¯ (IAAF) rules on lowering testosterone levels in female athletes. The latest on this including the Court of Arbitration for Sport¡¯s (CAS) ruling against Semenya¡¯s IAAF discrimination case.

The seminar sought to highlight Rhodes Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø¡¯s commitment to promoting gender awareness and gender equity, including LGBTQI++ issues within the context of the Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø's Equity Policy and transformation initiatives, which are overseen by, among others, the Equity and Institutional Culture Office.

Director of Equity & Institutional Culture Noluxolo Nhlapho introduced the panel, which included Professor Steve Cornelius of the Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø of Pretoria and former member of the IAAF Disciplinary Tribunal, who notably resigned from the body in protest over the testosterone rules in mid-2018.

Prof Cornelius spoke about the intricacies of Semenya¡¯s case, as well as the case of Burundian athlete Francine Niyonsaba, a close rival of Semenya¡¯s in the 800-metre races at the 2016 Olympics and the 2017 IAAF World Championships. Niyonsaba was flown to Europe, tested, medicated, and when the treatment didn¡¯t work, she was sequestered to a camp in Kenya. ¡°Surely this sort of thing should be considered a crime against humanity?¡± he declared.

Niyonsaba revealed earlier this year that she has hyperandrogenism ¨C a condition that results in high levels of naturally-occurring testosterone in the female body ¨Cand this added voice to Semenya¡¯s discrimination case against the IAAF. Prof Cornelius reminded the audience that Semanya¡¯s case continues at the Switzerland Supreme Court, which has issued a short-term suspension on the IAAF¡¯s rules to regulate excessive testosterone levels in female athletes.

Also speaking as well on the panel was Babalwa Mtshawu, intersex activist and PhD candidate at the Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø of the Free State. Mtshawu said that Semenya¡¯s case specifically resonated with her as it speaks of a black female from a previously-disadvantaged background, who could not have initially understood gender distinctions like intersex, and was therefore not prepared for the magnitude of the gender war she was to face.

¡°For me, this case has been way bigger than what it is for other people. I look at Caster Semenya as the girl from a disadvantaged background, fighting against the world¡¯s governing [sports] body all by herself. Fighting issues of gender politics, human biology, athletes¡¯ rights, and racism all packaged together. It is a lot to deal with for one person,¡± she said.

According to Mtshawu, the IAAF¡¯s Eligibility Regulations for Athletes with Differences of Sexual Development (DSD) are exclusionary, as they only categorise ¡®intersex¡¯ into five groups. For instance, Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS) is not included in the IAAF¡¯s regulations. CAIS is a condition where a person is genetically male, but possesses the physical traits of a woman.

The last of the three-member panel was Shingi Mtero of Rhodes Å·ÖÞ±­×ãÇòÍø_ÍâΧÂòÇòappÍÆ¼ö-Ͷע|¹ÙÍø¡¯s Political and International Studies Department. Mtero, a lecturer and researcher in topics including African Feminisms, entitled her speech ¡®Caster Contesting Constructed Identities¡¯, challenging the hegemony of constructed sexual identities.

¡°When we discuss who should be included in a ¡®category¡¯ depending on whether they are male or female, man or woman; we should also discuss the ways in which these identities were constructed ¨C out of particular histories, and particular contexts. And that these [categories] were universalised in a way which has created meaning for everybody. But in reality, not everybody was included in creating that meaning,¡± she said.

Mtero argued that Semenya embodies disruption and contests gender segregation in sport, prompting us to question whether this separation ¡°is still fit for purpose¡±.

In conclusion, Mtero, in reference to Mtshawu¡¯s point on the DSD regulations, said: ¡°It defies all logic to exclude people on tests that cannot be replicated, and tests that cannot definitively tell whether a person is a woman or man. If the international sports mandate is to display the best athletes in the world, we cannot exclude people simply because we cannot ¡®fit¡¯ them within the gender binary. Rather, we should expand these categories to allow the best athletes to continue to compete.¡±